EVE Search - Burner Mission - Ship advice to solo them including fittings

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Missions & Complexes

Burner Mission - Ship advice to solo them including fittings

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Arthur Aihaken Narada 4150	Posted - 2015.03.21 03:14:31 - [1] - Quote stoicfaux wrote: edit: Oh and here's Dinsdale being a negative nellie. I miss Dinsdale. His threads were always entertaining. As for soloing Burners, screw that. Just bring an alt or a friend. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 4717	Posted - 2015.10.31 04:48:22 - [2] - Quote Anize Oramara wrote: I'm trying out the Gurista Base burner too now. So far it has not gone well. At all. The prophecy 'works' in that I have to yolo dozens of drones at the dragonflies while they chew them up faster than I can give commands to attack. It's stupid and dumb(the mission, not the fit). I have to agree. This Burner mission is a complete waste of time. With the Prophecy fit and all V missile skills this thing still took foreverGäó to complete. A close second was completing the Angel Base Burner in a Gila... I can't say that either was "fun", to be perfectly honest. Pretty sure for the time invested I could've made substantially more ISK, LP and salvage running straight L4s. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 4717	Posted - 2015.10.31 05:00:27 - [3] - Quote Disclaimer: This fit will tank everything in the mission, but it takes a long time to complete (not Guristas Base Burner bad, but not by much). Don't bother with any other missile type - even with two 60% webs you can't apply full damage with either Faction or Fury ammunition. You can bring drones, but they're the sacrificial lamb on the alter for all of maybe a minute. Mediums drones will occasionally get lucky and score a hit with two webs; lights will regularly hit with a single web - but they get destroyed quickly. [Gila, Angel Burner Base] 4x Rapid Light Missile Launcher II, Precision Inferno Light Missiles Small Tractor Beam II 1x Shield Recharger II 2x Large Shield Extender 1x Pithum C-Type EM Ward Amplifier 1x Pithum C-Type Explosive Deflection Amplifier 1x Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I 2x Shield Power Relay II 2x Ballistic Control System II 3x Medium Core Defense Field Purger II When you take our the 4 Burner Dramiel Escorts, refit and switch to Fury ammunition for the Burner Clone Soldier Transport. The extra pair of Shield Power Relay II's are to allow you to refit for bio breaks (etc.) 1x Mobile Depot 1x 50MN Cold-Gas Enduring Microwarpdrive 1x Ballistic Control System II 2x Shield Power Relay II Fury Inferno Light Missiles I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 4717	Posted - 2015.10.31 22:24:40 - [4] - Quote Anize Oramara wrote: Have you tried the Orthrus for the blood burner? Check it out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEWJwv6CO88 I will definitely check it out, thanks. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 4717	Posted - 2015.11.01 03:47:29 - [5] - Quote atomic killer wrote: why would you use Gila for angel burner base in the first place. Vigilang is the way to go. Speaking only for myself, I don't have the requisite gunnery and cruiser skills to pull it off. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 4724	Posted - 2015.11.06 03:37:26 - [6] - Quote Hasikan Miallok wrote: On a semi-related note has anyone come across this missile range script bug ? Yes, but I believe it's been there for some time (the MGC and MGEs have simply made it more noticeable). I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 4728	Posted - 2015.11.10 22:38:58 - [7] - Quote Anize Oramara wrote: The mission, even with a bling ship with bling mods takes AGES to complete. Never do the gurista base burner ever, complete waste of time. So with the Burner changes and buffs players are talking about in December, is that RIP solo Burners? I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 4728	Posted - 2015.11.11 01:05:12 - [8] - Quote Anize Oramara wrote: On the upside I think I just got a fit for the team burners that's actually faster than the brute force polarized Garmur and a LOT faster than the LML ECM one too. But I liked the brute force one... I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 4730	Posted - 2015.11.11 19:49:52 - [9] - Quote Anize Oramara wrote: On the upside I think I just got a fit for the team burners that's actually faster than the brute force polarized Garmur and a LOT faster than the LML ECM one too. Other than having to change out the ECM modules, I like this new fit. The only change I would suggest is a T2 missile guidance enhancer in the low instead of the signal amplifier. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 4730	Posted - 2015.11.11 21:25:51 - [10] - Quote Anize Oramara wrote: I'm finding it's very random, but then that's the nature of ECM. Not sure yet if I'll keep with this build or not. The signal enhancer is to help keep jams on the logi a bit longer and lock them up sooner once they do go out of range and come back. switching out the range script for a precision script for every burner except the jaguar is also something you can do if you have the range on the rockets to allow it. An alternative method to run this is to stagger the jams on a single logi and then kill the 2nd logi. Might be more consistent if slower. As I mentioned in the other thread, simply applying (and not necessarily succeeding) ECM to both logi as sufficient. Don't ask me why. That's why I like the fit. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 4845	Posted - 2015.12.12 02:07:23 - [11] - Quote The thing I despise most about Burners is having to switch out from a battleship to a frigate or cruiser. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 4845	Posted - 2015.12.12 02:24:59 - [12] - Quote Anize Oramara wrote: That's what I like the most Having a whole hanger full of actual, useful ships that I actually use to make isk with. But hay, it's ok, I don't like using alts all that much so there's something for everyone, even people who don't like playing the game Maybe what bothers me is that the fits required to complete the Burners are so far removed from reality. You're basically fighting Officer-fit Burners. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 4861	Posted - 2015.12.15 11:03:59 - [13] - Quote Is there a viable non-based Gila alternative for the Ashimmu Burner? I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 4863	Posted - 2015.12.15 16:53:49 - [14] - Quote Market McSelling Alt wrote: Drake Navy Issue passive tanked with Cal Navy Hams is expensive but fast Interesting. Have a fit or link to a fit I could check out? I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 4868	Posted - 2015.12.17 01:11:39 - [15] - Quote Chainsaw Plankton wrote: I have a few navy drakes sitting around tempted to give them a try. Guessing from the LP reward a bunch of people said screw it and just run it in a drake or something? I don't have a better way to explain the LP reward as it is. Although if drone aggro is back to "normal" then staying with the gila is probably better. The Navy Drake isn't going to cut it - not unless you drop a few BCS in lieu of shield power relays (which will really neuter your DPS). I managed to kill one Sentinel and get the Ashimmu into armor before I bit it (and that was using drones as bait, too). I think you'd need a minimum of 2 shield power relays, but the loss of DPS will also prolong how long you have to tank incoming damage. Chainsaw Plankton wrote: Looks like a few gankers in Lanngisi targeting typical burner mission frigates in insta thrashers, already have a few very shiny kills. AKA why I'd never fly a 3x faction bcu garmur. And totally makes me want to go full on yarr! every time I see one posted. apparently a few people actually fly them in game and in an SoE hub. Just imagine if Lanngisi was a 0.4 system... Anize Oramara wrote: Lol, took them long enough. They're just inherently lazy... I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 4879	Posted - 2015.12.18 06:05:19 - [16] - Quote That's really interesting. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 4901	Posted - 2015.12.26 00:52:40 - [17] - Quote Arik VanClaw wrote: Brilliant! This fit is way better than the ecm fits. Just plow through one logi and then kill the burner. Doesn't take much longer than the blinged fit either. Way better than risking 300+ mill that can be ganked by a lone thrasher. Well done! I love the cheap fit as well. The only that unnerves me is the occasional wrecking shot from the Jaguar! I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 4951	Posted - 2016.02.10 11:52:08 - [18] - Quote How do we get this thread stickied? I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5061	Posted - 2016.05.06 18:36:31 - [19] - Quote Morgan Agrivar wrote: Lost a Worm to the Jaguar today and now I think I will just give up on doing Burner missions. This is the second ship I have lost and haven't completed a Burner mission yet. Just a suggestion: You may want to stick to Burner missions that are relatively safe to complete. The Polarized Garmur fit works with all Team Burners and is basically foolproof. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5062	Posted - 2016.05.07 03:40:53 - [20] - Quote https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=454677&find=unread I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5062	Posted - 2016.05.07 19:21:35 - [21] - Quote Queotzcatl wrote: I have not seen any fit for the Guristas Wyfern mission. That's because no one in their right mind runs it. For the time and effort involved in completing it, you're better off running any standard L4 mission. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5062	Posted - 2016.05.07 21:58:45 - [22] - Quote Queotzcatl wrote: [quote=Arthur Aihaken][quote=Queotzcatl]20 Mil in bounties and prizes plus 11k Lp. No loot. Yeah, not really worth it, but it was fun going there in my jackdaw and try to kill them fighters!! It's worth running the mission once, if only to experience firsthand how much an ordeal completing it is. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5063	Posted - 2016.05.09 17:22:18 - [23] - Quote Sid358 wrote: new change: 250dps and more tracking! [Jaguar, Jaguar Burner Blood New] Shield Power Relay II Republic Fleet Gyrostabilizer Republic Fleet Gyrostabilizer Republic Fleet Gyrostabilizer Gistum C-Type Thermal Dissipation Amplifier Gistum B-Type EM Ward Amplifier Caldari Navy Medium Shield Extender Fleeting Compact Stasis Webifier 200mm AutoCannon II, Republic Fleet Fusion S 200mm AutoCannon II, Republic Fleet Fusion S 200mm AutoCannon II, Republic Fleet Fusion S Small Energy Nosferatu II Small Core Defense Field Purger II Small Core Defense Field Purger II Republic Fleet Fusion S x20000 I like! Is that enough tank? I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5103	Posted - 2016.05.20 01:09:22 - [24] - Quote Kolmogorow wrote: But: Is it fast enough? I don't believe it is, no. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5175	Posted - 2017.01.17 05:54:44 - [25] - Quote My favorite is still the polarized rocket Garmur. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5243	Posted - 2017.01.31 01:23:46 - [26] - Quote Chainsaw Plankton wrote: Fed navy web is standard as you can heat it and catch the succubus at max range. Also you really want a 60% web, 55% just isn't enough, I tried using a CN web and if it weren't for my links in system I don't think I would have been able to complete the mission. How does that work now with links having to be on-grid? I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5423	Posted - 2017.02.09 19:53:49 - [27] - Quote That's an interesting twist with your VNI fit. I might have to give that a try - thanks. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5747	Posted - 2017.02.24 01:23:48 - [28] - Quote So with the proposed signature change to fighters... is the Guristas Base Burner mission going to be more viable? I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5749	Posted - 2017.02.24 09:10:45 - [29] - Quote Does anyone have a relatively cheap/cap-stable fit for the Angel Dramiel Burner? Wine is causing unexpected lockups on my Mac since the last update (otherwise I'd use the Daredevil in Anize's guide). Thanks in-advance. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5750	Posted - 2017.02.24 10:50:07 - [30] - Quote Thanks gang - greatly appreciated! I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5779	Posted - 2017.02.26 03:25:40 - [31] - Quote They should change the Guristas Base Burner to the new Chimera. Lugh Crow-Slave loves the new redesign and would be absolutely stoked. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.